Cheongju District Court Judge, same court prosecutor
9 times around the court · 6.36 million Won
I often call "Brother" · "Brother"
I tried to present the defendant to the tribunal.
The court does not find evidence
<img src = "http://img.hani.co.kr/imgdb/resize/2018/1118/00500660_20181118.JPG" style = "width: 643px;" title = "Seoul Supreme Court. <한겨레> Article photo "alt =" Supreme Court of Seoul. <한겨레> Article photo "/>
Seoul Supreme Court Seoho – gu. Photo article
The Supreme Court confirmed the innocence of the former judge, who received millions of tortures won for the loss of a criminal offense, which was tried by another court in the same court during his term of office as a judge. They called each other "Brother" and "Brother" and often contacted them, but for an indefinite reason: "It seems that they did not speak at all about the content of the proceedings." The court heard innocent rice prices for judges, dear advocates at expensive nightclubs and honorably pleaded guilty to restaurants and bars near the court.
The Supreme Court said Tuesday that former judge Kim Jaeu (41, Institute of Judicial Research and Training), who was charged with bribery, confirmed the verdict of innocence. Mr. Kim was presented to Mr. No (40) by the defendant at the Cheongju District Court, which was the motive for the Institute of Judicial Research and Training in July 2013, when he was a judge at the Changju District Court. After that, two people met 9 times with an interval of 7 to 10 days in nightclubs. Kim, a former lawyer, opened the lawsuit in early 2014, and two years later, Lee sued Kim for requesting a return of 20 million won for entertainment. The prosecution charged Kim that he was charged with the incident of 6,660,000 won in the court of first instance.
Lee said during the investigation and trial at the prosecutor's office: "I told him that I was tried the first time I met Kim." However, the first deputy, District Attorney Daejon 12 (Judge Park Chang-jai), declared innocence in January, saying: “It’s hard to believe Lee’s statements.” The court said: “Lee met with Kim several times and drank for a long time and did not tell a specific story about the ongoing trial, and did not ask for help by phone or text message. This is quite unusual in the behavior of a person who asked for mediation and provided some entertainment. ” I was told that I was tried in the Cheongju District Court, and I did not say what kind of content it was, so it is difficult to understand it as a bribe. The judge said: “As a former judge, Kim may have thought that Lee, who has a financial advantage, offers entertainment to his“ friendships ”with him.
In particular, two of them dined together in the house of Samgyupsala near Cheongju-ji, and Kim went to the prosecutors of Cheongju who were at the other tables and greeted them. If there was a request, it would not be such a meeting. ” The prosecutor, the judge, the defendant and the lawyer innocently referred to the distorted landscape of the local legal system that “fits”. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea (the Supreme Court of Korea), who was the chief judge of the Supreme Court of the Daejeon High Court for a second term, ruled that he was not guilty of the fact I confirmed.
The court was very stingy with the admission of the judge’s approval of a “bribe for legal proceedings”. The Supreme Court ruled in the case of the former Supreme Court judge Kim Soo-chun last year, This was due to the fact that “quite unexpectedly giving a bribe in advance of the trial” in advance, because it was before the first trial, when the cash flow was 165 million won, including the foreign car, continued.
Kim Min Kyung reporter [email protected]