Saturday , January 16 2021

Was the phone of AND Ajit Doval tapped in the CBI battle

As the grim details of the bitter feud between CBI chief Alok Verma and his deputy Rakesh Ashkhana continue to fall, the government took note of the possibility that “sensitive numbers” are subject to illegal surveillance and even fraudulently purchasing SIM cards in their ID cards or cloning them numbers.

The fear of improper use of SIM cards to attract government officials rose on Monday, when lawyer Suresh Chandra said that he was not in London on November 8, when he, passing on a statement filed by the CBI DIG Manish Sinha, allegedly appealed to businessman Satish Bab Sana, a key figure in the ugly saga, through an IAS recruiting officer in Andhra Pradesh Reha Rani.

Sinha quotes Sana, who was the first to bring bribery charges against the CBI chief before turning on Asthana with a similar statement, telling his team that Rekha Rani asked a controversial businessman to talk to Chandra on a number of London. The secretary of the law told POI that he only visited London once this year, and that was in July.

“It reads like a perfect frame scenario. You can arrest someone on the basis of the alleged appeal, and he will not be able to prove his innocence before the start of the trial, and the fraud is subject to forensic examination, ”said a senior government official.

In their statements, both Xinha and his youngest, CBI DSP A K Bassi, talked about phone surveillance. Sinha even spoke in detail about the alleged content of conversations between NSA Ajit Doval and Astana. “The NSA told Rakesh Ashkhan about the FIR, and Ashkhana reportedly asked the NSA not to be arrested,” said a shunted DIG in its petition. CJI and others on the bench, Judges S K Kaul and K M Joseph, were upset that the “unfounded” accusations were impartially distributed, although they were not yet indicated in court.

But what suppressed the CJI also caused alarming calls in government circles. For, implied in the claim, is the possibility that the telephone numbers of both Doval and Ashkhana are among the few that, according to Xinh, were monitored.

A research agency cannot tab on phones without the approval of the home secretary. The exception is granted in accordance with the “emergency clause”, which allows the head of the agency to allow preliminary observation in circumstances that have been clearly mentioned. However, the agency must inform the home secretary within three days and receive confirmation within seven days, otherwise the telecommunications company will stop rejecting calls to servers specifically set for eavesdropping.

Source link