For its part, SpaceX stated that it “actively promotes safety in the workplace, and we are confident that our comprehensive employment and workplace programs exceed all applicable contractual requirements.”
And Boeing, who is probably wondering what this is actually connected with, said that he “supports the program in the workplace without drugs and alcohol. We do this so that we can promote a safe, healthy and productive working environment, and this program is really NASAAnd the requirements for the contractor of the Ministry of Defense. " (A Boeing spokesman said NASA gave no reason for review and did not provide much detail about this process.)
The first test flights with astronauts, which have already been selected, are scheduled for the summer of 2019 as soon as possible. A new review may delay efforts that have already been fixed by technical problems and overly optimistic schedules. In accordance with MessageThe review will be a “monthly assessment that will include hundreds of interviews designed to assess the culture of jobs”.
Rogan The podcast was recorded in California, where recreational use of marijuana is legal. But the federal government still considers marijuana a controlled substance, like heroin and cocaine. And NASAcontracts with SpaceX and Boeing for the crew’s commercial program require contractors to “support the program to attain drug-free and alcohol-free labor” and to conduct “prior training, reasonable suspicion, random, post-accident and periodic periodic testing of employees in sensitive positions for in violation of applicable law or federal regulation, alcohol or a controlled substance. "
There is no word about whether Musk was subjected to drug testing after a podcast, but according to the environment NASA requires SpaceX, the company probably would have a "reasonable suspicion."
In this context, in which SpaceX is a contractor NASA, clearly dissatisfaction of officials with the actions of Muska makes sense. Perhaps for government officials, this is not the accidental use of marijuana in masks that irritated them, but instead of using it in the public mind, in a video that received over 2 million views in less than one day, a few months before his company was to launch man into space using taxpayer dollars.
“If I see something inappropriate, the key problem for me is what is the culture that led to this irrelevance, and NASA by participating in this, "Jim Bridenstein, NASA admin said Message“As an agency, we not only behave, but also our contractors. We need to show the American public that when we put an astronaut on a rocket, they will be safe. ”
From this point of view, NASAThe decision to admonish Muska in some capacity may seem wise. Is the question Musk a long and large-scale review of hundreds of employees, not in one, but in two companies, is another question.