The defense of the former frentist, whose case gave rise to a whole movement of the artistic world and even inspired the play, argued that the evidence against him was false. However, the higher court dismissed his arguments, making sure that the appeal “does not meet the requirements or standards required by the reason for the extraordinary verdict.” A spokesman for Mateluna, Davor Harasic, argued that "those of us who are convinced of our innocence are not going to save money in order to continue exploring ways that could prove this innocence" [EN DESARROLLO]
In a unanimous decision, the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court rejected the appeal for reconsideration and confirmed the conviction of the former member of the Patriotic Front Manuel Rodriguez (FFMR) Jorge Matelune, who thus played the last letter to cancel the sentence against him. and get the opening of the new court.
In 2013, Mateluунаn was convicted of robbery with intimidation for assaulting a bank branch in the commune of Pudauel, and was sentenced to 16 years in prison.
However, his defense claimed that the evidence against him was false, so they tried to reopen the case.
In fact, in this case, the captain of Carabineros, Juan Claudio Muñoz, is formalized to falsify a public document. The man in the form made a mistake regarding the recognition of the prisoners of this case, in which one of the witnesses identified one of those who was involved in the robbery, and not Matelun.
Despite the preceding circumstances, the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court did not accept the appeal filed by Matelauna’s defender Davor Kharasic, noting that “the lawsuit filed during this trial does not meet the requirements and does not meet the standards required for consideration on the grounds.” – with an extraordinary character – the sentence handed down by the government res judicata, and thus delegitimizing the conviction by the judges of the instance, the reason why the attempt to act will be rejected. "
The decision of the Supreme Court was taken by the ministers Hugo Dolmesch, Carlos Künsemüller, Manuel Valderrama, Jorge Dam and lawyer Rodrigo Viel.
Davor Kharasic, meanwhile, made a decision. “It is clear to all of us that the Supreme Court is the pinnacle of the judiciary, and therefore we must only abide by the ruling (…). We are going to analyze it, I think that those of us who are convinced of the innocence of Jorge Mateluna, without prejudice to the execution of the decision, we will not spare the means to continue studying ways that could prove this innocence. ”
The case of Mateluna spawned a whole movement of the artistic world and even inspired the play. During the reign of Michelle Bachelet, steps were taken to pardon the former front, but then Justice Minister Jaime Kampos did not make a decision.