Thursday , November 14 2019
Home / canada / We don't need Ted Bundy anymore.

We don't need Ted Bundy anymore.

Zac Efron as Bundy in Extremely Evil, Shockingly Evil and Vile (left) and Talking with a Killer Netflix (right).

For nearly 45 years since his first arrest, public admiration has gripped Ted Bundy’s crimes and refused to let go. Bundy’s crimes — he confessed to killing at least 30 women — were incredibly well documented and discussed; every possible narrative genre found deep interest in Bundy. In 1986, he was played by actors from Mark Harmon. Intentional stranger Cary elvis in River man in 2004 and most recently Zac Efron in the upcoming film Extremely Angry, Shockingly Angry and VileBundy is mentioned in the songs of Eminem, Tyler, the Creator and T.I. Jane's Addiction song “Ted, Just Admit It” even contains an example of an interview that Bundy gave in the 80s. In 1989, when Bundy was electrocuted in Florida, Debbie Harry from Blondy told the newspaper that, in her opinion, she once got into the car with him – later it was considered extremely unlikely, but Harry continues to tell this story to various magazines and newspapers, repeating it again in 2010 The sun.

In the Longreads essay on the “garbage balance” of true crime, Soraya Roberts summed up four general explanations for why we love crime stories: “A true crime can be a cathartic channel for our primary motivations, a source of gloating, controlled environments, to experience the thrill of fear and a way to arm us (especially women) the knowledge to protect themselves. " All this may be true at once, but when trying to explain our rotten desire for more and more criminal stories, we tend to resort to defense. We think that we cannot know enough about the killers, so we pretend that we can continue to tell stories about them, and these falsities feed off each other until they swell. In fact, we know everything we need to know about Bundy, and the stories that we continue to tell about him create circles around the truth.

In 1978 New York Times published an article about Bundy entitled “The All-American Boy in Court,” in which the author, John Nordheimer, suffered because of Bundy’s “Bannian appearance”, wondering how someone who had it all could commit the crimes he committed . Netflix recently wrote a “reminder” to people whose takeaways from the new documentary series Conversations with the killer: tapes Ted Bundy was that the bundy is hot

Bundy has benefited from his position as a white man all his life, even during his ordeal. He was clearly attractive, but at the same time he looked average enough to slip through the police grip several times. When he was finally caught, he was given a special appeal in prison. He was given better food than other prisoners. The guards easily treated him because of his “humor and brightness”, which allowed him to appear in court without leg irons, and Bundy used his “sympathy” – his privileges as a white man – briefly escaped in June 1977 and again December.

Even after his death, Bundy benefits from the racist attitudes we have about people committing violence. Where people of color, especially blacks, are considered inherently cruel, white people who commit crimes are often glorified. In the article for Teen voguewriter Sandra Song pointed out our cultural obsession with the canonization of Bundy and other white serial killers as appealing; she noted the danger of throwing hot idols of teenagers, such as Zac Efron and Ross Lynch, in fictional tales about the lives of serial killers. Bundy is known for committing crimes because of his obvious attractive appearance, but he remembered this path because of the lengthy narration in the media, in the center of which his appearance is central to his crimes.

Of course, the only other media narrative that is more popular than Hot Bundy is Mysterious Bundy. We like the idea that we will never know what prompted Bundy to cause people such a horrific degree. However, as noted by the writer Zoe Samuji twitterMany of the serial killers we are trying to understand are killed for reasons of privilege and rights.

In her book Protect the devilLawyer Bundy Polly Nelson wrote: “It was an absolute misogyny of his crimes that stunned me … his sheer rage against women. He had no compassion at all … His killings were the accomplishments of his life. ” Psychiatric tests as early as 1978 found that Bundy was deeply angry with women. Nordheimer himself wrote about these tests in his article for Time– however, he continued, saying that women entering the labor force destroyed families and created damaged children. Bundy also sometimes blamed his victims for their deaths.

Since his position as a white middle-class man makes him a figure of American identity and nationalism, we are convinced that Bundy cannot be distorted for any reason that we can easily understand. This is why Bundy is also endlessly pathological — diagnoses include everything from bipolar disorder to psychopathy. Although the psychological elements of his crimes are indisputable, by and large, Bundy was motivated by hatred of women.

Continuing to make Bundy the object of our films, songs, TV shows and podcasts, we give the narcissus exactly what he always wanted – attention. And none of this is of any use, as most media outlets about Bundy do little to reveal the causes of their crimes, as far as they convey bloody details to the perverse curiosity of viewers.

Photographer Henry Hargreaves has a series called “No Seconds,” in which he chronicles the latest dishes of prisoners sentenced to death, such as Timothy McVey and Ted Bundy. Hargreaves said that the photo of Victor Feger’s last dish is one olive — his favorite. "We think about the last meals, and it will be something completely voracious, and then he has only one olive," said Hargreaves. “You know, it's so simple, beautiful and kind of like a finale. It’s like a complete stop at the end of his life. ” The way Hargreaves speaks about Feger's last meal is strangely romantic. To speak with such affection about someone who kidnapped and shot a person is alarming. Nevertheless, this is just one example of countless other artistic manifestations of the lives of the murderers, who put them on pedestals of charm, supported by the ever-growing boundaries of our curiosity.

People called for Bundy’s hobbies often defend themselves by saying that they are trying to understand the human mind and that will cause someone to commit these terrible crimes. People also advocate talk about serial killers because of the belief that we can never stop future killers if we don’t understand them. Simply put, our society is obsessed with serial killers — especially whites, males such as Bundy — and we canonized them as impossible to understand, which allows us to continue to make media about them. However, these media do nothing but make us want more.

We have access to a huge number of works of art, writing and other media that were created in order to satisfy our appetites for true crimes, and yet we continue to talk about serial killers that we cannot understand. Bundy was convicted of killing more than 30 women, and it is estimated that he killed more than 100 people. However, most of us cannot name any of the victims of Ted Bundy. Even those of us who argue fervently that we do not find the seductive Bundy participate in the sensational history of his crime and the dehumanization of his victims for decades every time we search for more stories.

In its current form, a real crime is a genre that is largely based on the use of details of horrendous crimes, especially crimes against marginalized people. This feeds our passion and puts the priorities in shock, and does not give us the final answers. But we should not look for bloody details; we should not try to understand the thoughts of serial killers as an answer to how to stop future killers. We must try to understand what systems allow their crimes, and what gives them mobility. We must be cautious when talking about their upbringing, privileges and social status. We need to identify the reasons that they supported, and what, in their opinion, they had the right, and do something with this information. If we are going to continue telling serial killer stories, we need to make fundamental changes in how we talk about them.

Follow shaylee on Twitter.

Source link