Despite Facebook scams, Instagram seems to have grown in popularity this year.
Even though the #DeleteFacebook users are boycotting Twitter, Instagram has gained a reputation as a peaceful social network, where there is no fight for democracy and privacy violations. People are even willing to ignore the fact that Facebook owns and manages Instagram! Unpopular Snapchat redesign can also be a factor.
There is something useful for users in limiting the photo and video sharing service. Instagram is also an eight-year app for the iPhone — it appeared the same year as the iPad. With the advent of 2019, the restriction only for the iPhone – this is what Instagram should remove and, finally, create an application for the iPad.
Instagram makes iPad apps
That makes so much sense. Instagram is great for sharing our favorite photos and videos, and iPads are great for appreciating both. Instagram stories are even amazing (even though they are obviously ripped off from Snapchat). And IGTV seems to be a complete failure, but the tablet version would be neat if it were not!
Facebook and Instagram know that the iPad exists. Facebook does almost normal work or supports Facebook and Messenger on the iPad, and Instagram even has two apps for the iPad camera – Hyperlapse and Boomerang – but you don't know that this is the main application.
(The Layout app for Instagram is also very nice. I see that many people use free advertising-supported alternatives with watermarks above the collage. Switch to Layout even if you don’t want to post to Instagram.)
Instagram killed iPad apps
The lack of a special Instagram app for the iPad used to be an opportunity for developers. For example, Retro for Instagram was a great solution, but Instagram changed its API, which gave developers access to the service in their applications.
Good times, Instagram Instagram, good times
Instagram has killed the market for alternative iPad apps without creating its own. Even the Twitter for Mac team should consider this as a savage – at least they only limit the capabilities of third-party applications after they kill their MacOS client!
Web applications are not applications.
One of the arguments is that a “progressive web application” on the Instagram website is enough if you save it on the main screen. This is normal, but it is a common “sweet solution” that cannot take advantage of this iPad app.
You can also launch the iPhone version in the comic window or increase its scale due to resolution accuracy, but there is no support for landscape orientation, and many iPads are now connected to keyboards.
This, but as a real application, it would be better than what we have now
There is a better way
Another argument against Instagram for iPad is that this is a problem with outdated technologies: the quality of photos may be too low for proper display on the tablet display.
But this is a problem that can be easily solved around! Instagram can send a grid of photos and even mix ads between them! Big screen, more advertising! This is my best step on Instagram.
This amazing concept Parker Ortolani This is another great example of how Instagram can tailor its iPhone app to iPad without losing visual accuracy on the big screen. I would like to sit and view photos and videos on Instagram for iPad in a dense informational layout with the same native resolution.
I don't think there is hope for the return of the Gotham filter, but I’m optimistic that Instagram for the iPad is just around the corner. Now that videos and messages, as well as Stories, group video calls, walkie-talkies and hundreds of other features are now available thanks to an Instagram solution to actively compete with Snapchat, Instagram for iPad should be next on the list, right? May be? With hope…
Sign up for 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news: